Sunday, December 18, 2011

Infantile anti-socialism


In the Weekend Post of 17th December, 2011 the column “Opposite Poles” by one Sameosi Mokgethiwa, declares:
It only goes to show that given a chance, these latter-day communists and socialists in the BNF (from whence Modubule came from [sic]) and BCP will easily ditch the socialist rhetoric for the gravy train only found in capitalism. That is what the Eastern Block countries did and China is following suit.
Well, I don’t know about what the Eastern Block countries did or are doing, but what the writer alleges China is doing, seems way off the mark.
When Chairman Mao Tse Tung posited that in order for China to win a world war, it only has to let a division of the Red Army surrender, very few people understood what he was talking about. Many thought he was talking about a military war, but only a few understood that he was talking about an economic war. Well, you only have to look at the world today to see what Mao meant. A division of the Chinese economic army has “surrendered” to capitalism. Now, who is winning the economic war?

Friday, December 16, 2011


Bakalanga and Baroe (Basotho, Batswana) – a deadly embrace!
I have been prompted to write this, by an article written by Jeff Ramsay in the Sunday Standard of December 11-17, 2011, entitled “Builders of Botswana 1; Children of the Mambo”. Jeff Ramsay’s focus is on events that occurred starting from around the 17th Century.  He writes:
The Bakwena royal names “Sechele” and “Sebele” for example, are apparently of Ikalanga origin. Does this mean that the Bakwena royalty were once Bakalanga? Absolutely not! They are rather the true descendents of Masilo a Malope, if not Matsieng of Lowe…
Right there JR, is the distinction between Bakalanga and BaTebele. A significant percentage of Bakalanga are descendants of Malope, while BaTebele descended from  Lowe. Lowe, as we know by now is Mapungubwe mesa in South Africa, but what is Malope?  Malope is the continent of Europe. The name Malope is a corruption of the Kalanga word “Malopa” meaning “Blood”. The current name “Europe” is a Roe (Sotho/Tswana) influence on the word Malopa to produce “Uropa”, which is a later reference to the European continent. Bakalanga (specifically Bayela) in Botswana are North Africans and Europeans who re-emigrated back into Africa, after wiping out the Neanderthal in Europe, hence “Blood”. The Neanderthal must have put up a fierce resistance to the Human incursion into Europe from North Africa.

On re-entry into Africa, the Europeans (Bayela) first settled in Sudan/Nubia (Taka dwa ku Bunyubi), before heading down south.
So there are three main categories of nations in Botswana today:
1.            Bakalanga (from Egypt and Nubia), among whom we count BaYela i.e. BakaHabangana, Bakwena, Bangwaketse, Bangwato, Batawana;  Banyayi i.e. the Moyo, the Chuma ; Bakaa and possibly others.
2.            BaTebele (from ancient Mapungubwe in South Africa), among whom we count Bahurutshe, BaRolong, BaKgatla, Batlokwa, Balete, Bahumbe, Barotsi and possibly others.
3.            Part-BaKalanga and part-BaTebele (initially from Mapungubwe/Lowe, but later from Egypt and environs), among whom we count Baperi i.e. BakaNswazwi, BakaMasunga etc.; Bakhurutshe.

There are very few Shonas in Botswana, if we exclude the Banyayi. It is instructive to note that Bangwato refer to Batalaote/Banyayi as “Baswina”. In Ikalanga language, the Shonas are referred to similarly, i.e. as “Baswina”. So who are these Baswina? In actual fact they are “Bazwina”, meaning “gate keepers” or “shields”. These are the people who used to act as a buffer between Bakalanga in lower Egypt (the North), and Baroe/Badawi in Upper Egypt (the South), until Pharao Mengwe (Narmer), a king of Baroe, broke loose from the south and conquered the north. It is this role of “Bazwina” that is now erroneously, attributed to the Bakaa, of Sebina/Tjibizina (allegedly Tjizwina) today, with claims that they were used as a shield by She Mengwe of Maitengwe. In actual fact the people whom Pharao Mengwe (Narmer) used as a shield, on his Northern flank, were indeed called Bazwina, i.e. the Shonas. They acted as a buffer between his (Mengwe’s) Baroe in Upper Egypt and the Bakalanga in Lower Egypt. That is why Shona language sounds like a hi-breed between Ikalanga and Chirwa (SeSotho, SeTswana).

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Ikalanga and Chirwa - deadly language embrace

Ancient Egypt, just like present day Botswana, was afflicted by a love-hate relationship between two languages, namely Ikalanga language in Lower Egypt, and Chirwa language around the city of Meroe and Medawi. In present day Botswana, Chirwa language has assumed the name of Setswana language.

I looked up the meaning of the name ARAB. You see, in Setswana the word ARABA means "to answer".It turns out that the word ARAB (in Arabic) means something like "answering audibly". Considering that the ancient scribes omitted the last vowel, this is the same meaning of the same word in Setswana. But what I find even more interesting is that the opposite to ARAB is AJMA, meaning "one who answers inaudibly".

Now, in Ikalanga language, the word ASHAMA means "to open one's mounth". There can be little doubt that AJMA (vowel omitted between J and M) derives from the Ikalanga word ASHAMA. So here we are, the Arabic language has adopted a Setswana word "ARAB/ARABA" and an Ikalanga opposite word "AJMA/ASHAMA" - a right deadly embrace!