Gizzida

Now that the orgy of celebration over my “...troubles with this and that...” have subsided, I would like to correct a few misconceptions. Although I do not know whether the Anunnaki spoke Kalanga before they flew towards earth, I do know that they spoke Kalanga after landing on earth. I also know that all humanity associated with the Anunnaki initially spoke Kalanga language.

In an earlier post I showed that the Sumerian cuneiform sound “sh-“, as in “shems”, meaning -rockets, was mistranslated. It should have been correctly translated as “ch-“, as in the Kalanga word “chima”, meaning -a rocket. From this, one can see that the correct pronunciation of Ningishzida was NinGiChizwida. This was the name of the Anunnaki god, Enki’s genius son.

It is also my name (in a way) and it unpacks as follows:

Nin(Gi): the younger one (on earth). This was my “Lemba/Jewish” grandmother’s name. She re-formatted it without changing the meaning, and gave it to me when I was born, more than 60 years ago.

Chizwida: loving/proud of him/her self. This has been my blogging persona from “ZWIDEnkalanga” to “NkalangaUnoZWIDA”. Followers of forums dot gov.bw will be aware of course that I only became aware of the phenomenon of the Illui (Anunnaki) long after I assumed the persona.

I appreciate that the majority of readers will laugh this revelation off as BS, especially considering that I am supposed to be “anonymous”; however I am aware that many people, including the ever seeing big brother, know my true identity. To these I say go on, check out my claims.

The reason I have revealed this is to stress that it would be a great mistake to dismiss Ben Saili’s writings on the Illuminati’s secret science of onomatology out of hand. As Ben remarked when writing about the origins of the name “Kennedy”: names can kill you, folks.

Weird judgment; really weird!

There are things I can’t understand about this Zimmerman trial. Zimmerman is a law-enforcement officer. He saw a man “just walking about...when it’s raining”, not an offence by any stretch of the imagination. Did the jurors ask themselves: WHY then did he contact the police dispatcher?

OK, let’s say he had a good reason to contact the police dispatcher. Was the reason, to ask for advice or reinforcements? As a law-enforcement officer, what does the LAW REQUIRE him to do, once he gets the advice he is seeking? If the law requires him to follow the advice, then he is guilty as hell for disobeying the law, leading to A FIGHT, and death of an innocent man. If the law is silent on how he should proceed after getting the advice, then the law is to blame for Trayvon Martin’s death. Of course if it’s reinforcements Zimmerman was asking for, he would have been expected to wait in his car as advised, until they arrived, instead of STARTING A FIGHT.

I wonder if the jurors asked themselves WHY the police dispatcher told Zimmerman “not to follow Trayvon Martin, but to stay in his car”. Was that perhaps a legal requirement, given the circumstances as reported, and the law-enforcement status of the reporter, Zimmerman? If it was a legal requirement, how then did Zimmerman’s actions NOT contribute to TM’s death?