Mass Bantu migration did not occur

According to the Kalanga tradition, newly arrived strangers at any given community are first identified and then settled among “their” local people. The identification takes the form of determining the stranger’s totem, and if possible the stranger’s specific group within that totem. As we have now established, a totem is closely associated with the task that the stranger’s workgroup used to perform during the Anunnaki presence on earth.

Wherever the Anunnaki settled (or camped) the people were divided into workgroups. The workgroups in the different settlements were therefore similar, to the extent that the tasks performed in the different localities were similar. While building the pyramids in Egypt, there was need for a group of people who extracted blocks of stone after the blocks were cut. These were “Badusi” or Germans as they are now called. There was no need for such people in Southern African Anunnaki  settlements, therefore if a German arrived in Southern Africa, a not-so-good fit into the community would have to be effected for him/her.  On the other hand if Egyptian Bayela, meaning “pyramid measurers”, or Greeks (as they are now called) arrived, they would be readily fitted among the milk-quantity measurers or grain quantity measurers.

The white colour of the Egyptians was of no consequence, just as the black colour of Southern Africans who went to Egypt was also of no consequence.  Indeed the blacks who emigrated to Egypt were identified by the fact that they had not sh!tted “Abesinya”, rather than by their colour. Since the language (Ikalanga) was common to mankind at the time, and there were no natural barriers like seas between North Africa and Southern Africa, people travelled between these places. The supposed mass Bantu migration from Central or North Africa to Southern Africa did not occur.

What did occur through the ages was migration of small groups of people, such as the Bakhurutshe who travelled to Egypt (Ka Mabunde) within recorded oral history, to accompany their queen who married an Egyptian Pharaoh. The Bakhurutshe travelled to Egypt either when the Anunnaki no longer ate sh!t but milk, or when the Anunnaki had left Earth. That is why the North Africans referred to them (Bakhurutshe) as Abesinya. The majority of the Bakhurutshe who stayed behind in Southern Africa have now had their name Tswana-lised to Bahurutshe. The Bakhurutshe ultimately returned to Southern Africa. To this day the Bakhurutshe do not look like the Bahurutshe or like other Southern Africans. They look more like Ethiopians than Southern Africans.

Indeed the facial appearance of the Bakhurutshe is a good measure, if one is needed, of the time that elapsed between the Anunnaki settlement at Mapungubwe, and the present. The Bakhurutshe changed from Black Southern African to Coffee-coloured North East African (Ethiopian), and are now well on the way to changing back to black Southern African.  These facial changes make nonsense of the claim that Mapungubwe was settled in the 15th century. You do not change from black to Asiatic and back to black in six hundred years. It takes much longer just to change from black to Asiatic.