Every time I leave my computer at home, someone enters my house during my absence, somehow by-passes the alarm, and installs a virus into my computer.
This forces me to download 257 MB of virus definitions on my return. At only about 20 kbps it takes me the whole day to do so. I don't think I can continue blogging much longer. It's really taking a heavy toll on me - having to be carrying my computer all over the place just to protect it from their agents!
Tuesday, August 12, 2014
Sunday, July 27, 2014
Marduk/Ra: "Mu si lime!" (Do not produce crops!)
The Kalanga verb upon which the word "Muslim" is based, is KU LIMA meaning TO PLOW or TO RAISE CROPS. It is not KU LUMA meaning TO BITE (chicken-wise mating), as I have written before.
Let us suppose that Marduk/Ra had issued an order to his followers: "Mu si lime!" meaning "Don't produce crops!” What would have been the result?
1. There would have followed almost immediately, an exodus from Egypt, of field irrigators - Banyayi. We know from numerous sources, including themselves in their self-praise, that Southern African Banyayi, i.e. the people whose totem is Moyo, came from Egypt. Even Dr. Livingstone observed that Banyayi, especially the women and their hair-do, are coffe-coloured and look like ancient Egyptians.
2. Egypt would have suffered a severe famine, despite abundance of water in the Nile River. We know that the exodus of the Israelites was preceded by, among other plagues, a severe famine in Egypt.
3. The followers of Ra, the "Arabas" would have ended up as animal herders rather than crop producers. We know that the Bedouin represent what could be called a typical Arab. In other words, the Arabs are indeed pastoral people. The same applies to our country's population. My grandfather told me that the differentiating characteristic between us Kalangas and the BaRwa (Ra's people) is that we cultivate the land for a living, while BaRwa rear livestock for a living. What I am saying here is that our country, Botswana is divided between Ra's followers and us Kalangas. Indeed the country was named after Ra. The name "Botswana" literally means "Land of Ra's peoplets!" if there is any such word as “peoplets” meant to express contempt. Thus the Ra vs. Ningishzidda conflict, currently raging as the “Arab/Israeli” conflict, reached our “shores” while the gods walked the earth. The irony of it is that the European “Israelites”, namely the British colonizers, used Ra’s people as proxies to subjugate us, their fellow “Israelites”!
4. Ra's [Mu si lime] doctrine would have a lot more to say about how to kill an animal than how to harvest crops. We know today that Islam has plenty to say about halaal meat. I am not aware of any teachings of Islam regarding harvesting of crops or preparation of crop-based food.
5. It would have been extremely difficult for Egyptians to keep pigs, as pigs heavily depend on vegetable and crop produce for sustenance. Therefore Ra’s doctrine would have, at the very least, discouraged rearing of pigs. As it turned out, it went further. The doctrine prohibited eating of pig meat altogether!
Whether or not it was Ra who issued the directive not to produce crops is open to argument. My view is that the directive was issued, and that only an Anunnaki could have dared issue a directive of such import.
Let us suppose that Marduk/Ra had issued an order to his followers: "Mu si lime!" meaning "Don't produce crops!” What would have been the result?
1. There would have followed almost immediately, an exodus from Egypt, of field irrigators - Banyayi. We know from numerous sources, including themselves in their self-praise, that Southern African Banyayi, i.e. the people whose totem is Moyo, came from Egypt. Even Dr. Livingstone observed that Banyayi, especially the women and their hair-do, are coffe-coloured and look like ancient Egyptians.
2. Egypt would have suffered a severe famine, despite abundance of water in the Nile River. We know that the exodus of the Israelites was preceded by, among other plagues, a severe famine in Egypt.
3. The followers of Ra, the "Arabas" would have ended up as animal herders rather than crop producers. We know that the Bedouin represent what could be called a typical Arab. In other words, the Arabs are indeed pastoral people. The same applies to our country's population. My grandfather told me that the differentiating characteristic between us Kalangas and the BaRwa (Ra's people) is that we cultivate the land for a living, while BaRwa rear livestock for a living. What I am saying here is that our country, Botswana is divided between Ra's followers and us Kalangas. Indeed the country was named after Ra. The name "Botswana" literally means "Land of Ra's peoplets!" if there is any such word as “peoplets” meant to express contempt. Thus the Ra vs. Ningishzidda conflict, currently raging as the “Arab/Israeli” conflict, reached our “shores” while the gods walked the earth. The irony of it is that the European “Israelites”, namely the British colonizers, used Ra’s people as proxies to subjugate us, their fellow “Israelites”!
4. Ra's [Mu si lime] doctrine would have a lot more to say about how to kill an animal than how to harvest crops. We know today that Islam has plenty to say about halaal meat. I am not aware of any teachings of Islam regarding harvesting of crops or preparation of crop-based food.
5. It would have been extremely difficult for Egyptians to keep pigs, as pigs heavily depend on vegetable and crop produce for sustenance. Therefore Ra’s doctrine would have, at the very least, discouraged rearing of pigs. As it turned out, it went further. The doctrine prohibited eating of pig meat altogether!
Whether or not it was Ra who issued the directive not to produce crops is open to argument. My view is that the directive was issued, and that only an Anunnaki could have dared issue a directive of such import.
Tuesday, July 15, 2014
This war must end - gods be gone!
The "Arab-Israeli" conflict had its origins between brother gods - Marduk and Ningishzidda, both sons of Enki. Since then, the conflict has taken various forms - Crusaders, Moors etc. Today it is concentrated around Palestine. But make no mistake about it, the conflict won't end with peace being achieved only in the Middle East. It will spread to all corners of the Earth, unless and until Man understands and accepts that he cannot possibly be the most intelligent thing in the Cosmos. Some will say "Of course it's obvious that we are not the most intelligent!..."; to which I will say "Why then can't we leave God to those who are more intelligent than ourselves, and simply get on with loving one another, as they advised us to do?".
Recall that when Marduk returned to Egypt from the location of the unsuccessful project to build the Tower of Babel, he was now called Ra, the one and only Sun God, and his followers had been re-programmed by the Lizards to speak different languages, among which was Coptic/Suthu/Tswana. But Ra, being Anunnaki, was immune to lizard programming, therefore he still spoke original Kalanga.
The Egyptian landscape he had left behind had now changed - his younger brother Ningishzidda had successfully designed and built the Gizza Pyramids. Marduk/Ra was murderously jealous of his younger brother's achievements. His father Enki intervened and persuaded Ningishzidda to relocate to South America as Thoth.
This is where it all went wrong. Enki should have sat down with Marduk/Ra and Ningishzidda and made them aware that the task Marduk had taken up - to build a space port in Sinai was beyond his capabilities NOT because he was less intelligent than his younger brother, but simply because he (Marduk) was neither a scientist nor an engineer.
By sending Ningishzidda away, and leaving Egypt all to Marduk/Ra, Enki sowed the seeds of the conflict we are witnessing today. Ningishzidda's followers, with whom he built the Gizza pyramids, rejected Ra's authority and became the Israelites (ISI RA, ILLUI) meaning NOT RA, BUT THE ILLUI. Some of them accompanied Ningishzidda to America while others were dispersed into Eurasia and yet others into Africa, up the Nile valley. Into all these places, the conflict will spread if and when peace comes to Gazza.
Since Marduk/Ra was Anunnaki, he too preferred to work/"live" AT NIGHT when temperatures were more bearable. The human workers however could only effectively function during the day. Ningishzidda/Thot, being a scientist, understood this. Ra however, being a lay Anunnaki, thought that the human work/sleep cycle could be altered by letting the human fast during the day and eat during the night. To this end a month was set aside (Ramadan) for this "experiment".
TO CALL in Kalanga is KU DANA. Do not confuse this with KU DA(NA), which expresses mutual love i.e. TO LOVE (EACH OTHER). So the Kalanga sentence "Ra, ma dana" means "Ra, you have called".
When viewed in the context of what the word ARAB means in Arabic, the expression "Ra, ma dana" makes a lot of sense. The Arabic language has some similareities to Coptic/Suthu/Tswana languages. The Tswana verb ARABA means ANSWER. Interestingly in Arabic the word Arab means ANSWER BOLDLY/AUDIBLY. We therefore have a situation where Kalanga-speaking Anunnaki god Ra would CALL (Ra, ma dana) and some Coptic/Tswana subjects would ANSWER (Araba).
It seems quite plausible therefore that those who boldly answered when Ra called during the testing month of Ra-Ma-Dana, to "LIVE" at night and fast during the day, ended up as the Arabs. Note that these people, were not a homogeneous nation/tribe like the English, Spanish, Greeks, Irish or Kushites, but a conglomeration of people from all these nations with one binding characteristic - answering the Sun God Ra's call. The Israelites (Isi-Ra-Illui) were their direct opposites - those who rejected Ra's authority! They too were not a single nation, but a conglomeration of nations.
When Ra fell out with the Lizards they (lizards) shut everything down in response, and Ra could not communicate with his subjects. He had to flee Egypt, and possibly Earth. Now, remember that these were the same lizards who had re-programmed the followers of Ra at the Tower of babel. After Ra fled, the lizards retained the ONE GOD philosophy because it worked fine for them - order was maintained.
Like any other faith or philosophy the Ra doctrine reached its zenith and began to decline. It's followers lost direction. Someone (a giver ofRa-madana) had to resurrect the faith. In Coptic/Tswana language, "a giver of Ra-madana" is called "Moha-Ra-madana". And so was born the prophet Mohammad (PBUH).
The bottom line is that both Israelites and Arabs originated from Egypt, and both have now elevated a conflict which started between two flesh and (green?) blood brothers to a conflict with "religious" connotations.
Recall that when Marduk returned to Egypt from the location of the unsuccessful project to build the Tower of Babel, he was now called Ra, the one and only Sun God, and his followers had been re-programmed by the Lizards to speak different languages, among which was Coptic/Suthu/Tswana. But Ra, being Anunnaki, was immune to lizard programming, therefore he still spoke original Kalanga.
The Egyptian landscape he had left behind had now changed - his younger brother Ningishzidda had successfully designed and built the Gizza Pyramids. Marduk/Ra was murderously jealous of his younger brother's achievements. His father Enki intervened and persuaded Ningishzidda to relocate to South America as Thoth.
This is where it all went wrong. Enki should have sat down with Marduk/Ra and Ningishzidda and made them aware that the task Marduk had taken up - to build a space port in Sinai was beyond his capabilities NOT because he was less intelligent than his younger brother, but simply because he (Marduk) was neither a scientist nor an engineer.
By sending Ningishzidda away, and leaving Egypt all to Marduk/Ra, Enki sowed the seeds of the conflict we are witnessing today. Ningishzidda's followers, with whom he built the Gizza pyramids, rejected Ra's authority and became the Israelites (ISI RA, ILLUI) meaning NOT RA, BUT THE ILLUI. Some of them accompanied Ningishzidda to America while others were dispersed into Eurasia and yet others into Africa, up the Nile valley. Into all these places, the conflict will spread if and when peace comes to Gazza.
Since Marduk/Ra was Anunnaki, he too preferred to work/"live" AT NIGHT when temperatures were more bearable. The human workers however could only effectively function during the day. Ningishzidda/Thot, being a scientist, understood this. Ra however, being a lay Anunnaki, thought that the human work/sleep cycle could be altered by letting the human fast during the day and eat during the night. To this end a month was set aside (Ramadan) for this "experiment".
TO CALL in Kalanga is KU DANA. Do not confuse this with KU DA(NA), which expresses mutual love i.e. TO LOVE (EACH OTHER). So the Kalanga sentence "Ra, ma dana" means "Ra, you have called".
When viewed in the context of what the word ARAB means in Arabic, the expression "Ra, ma dana" makes a lot of sense. The Arabic language has some similareities to Coptic/Suthu/Tswana languages. The Tswana verb ARABA means ANSWER. Interestingly in Arabic the word Arab means ANSWER BOLDLY/AUDIBLY. We therefore have a situation where Kalanga-speaking Anunnaki god Ra would CALL (Ra, ma dana) and some Coptic/Tswana subjects would ANSWER (Araba).
It seems quite plausible therefore that those who boldly answered when Ra called during the testing month of Ra-Ma-Dana, to "LIVE" at night and fast during the day, ended up as the Arabs. Note that these people, were not a homogeneous nation/tribe like the English, Spanish, Greeks, Irish or Kushites, but a conglomeration of people from all these nations with one binding characteristic - answering the Sun God Ra's call. The Israelites (Isi-Ra-Illui) were their direct opposites - those who rejected Ra's authority! They too were not a single nation, but a conglomeration of nations.
When Ra fell out with the Lizards they (lizards) shut everything down in response, and Ra could not communicate with his subjects. He had to flee Egypt, and possibly Earth. Now, remember that these were the same lizards who had re-programmed the followers of Ra at the Tower of babel. After Ra fled, the lizards retained the ONE GOD philosophy because it worked fine for them - order was maintained.
Like any other faith or philosophy the Ra doctrine reached its zenith and began to decline. It's followers lost direction. Someone (a giver of
The bottom line is that both Israelites and Arabs originated from Egypt, and both have now elevated a conflict which started between two flesh and (green?) blood brothers to a conflict with "religious" connotations.
Wednesday, June 25, 2014
More on ancient Maori hieroglyphic script
The ancient Maori hieroglyph referred to here is that recorded by Richard Taylor in 1861. In my view the sloping straight line signifies the flight path of the space ship. The human figure with the "sperm" has sloping eyes, akin to an alien's, unlike the other two human figures.
I believe the message transmitted is something like:
"We sailed (down the incline) from the twin star [6] in the constellation [4] where we lived as earth-bound (backward-pointing feet) birds [15] under our (smaller/more distant) sun [6]. We embarked onto our spaceship [7] and travelled down past the stars [3]. We first landed on the moon [2] before finally disembarking [8] here on earth, where we used our sperm [11] to produce working human beings [13,14] under your sun [9] and rain [12]."
I believe the message transmitted is something like:
"We sailed (down the incline) from the twin star [6] in the constellation [4] where we lived as earth-bound (backward-pointing feet) birds [15] under our (smaller/more distant) sun [6]. We embarked onto our spaceship [7] and travelled down past the stars [3]. We first landed on the moon [2] before finally disembarking [8] here on earth, where we used our sperm [11] to produce working human beings [13,14] under your sun [9] and rain [12]."
Tuesday, June 24, 2014
Surely there's information here?
Unless it was severely distorted by those who recorded it, the ancient hieroglyphic script of the Maori, found on Pitcairn's island suggests some interesting things. At the top right side there is a cross, which could mean the southern cross constellation or some other constellation such as the Pleiades. Near the cross there is, possibly a double star system.
What is most interesting is the human at the extreme left end of the downward incline. What some may have interpreted to be a tail may actually be a sperm. So the whole picture resonates with the Sumerian account of man's creation, in my opinion. Unfortunately I am not in a position to read what the listed authors have already written about the hieroglyphs.
What is most interesting is the human at the extreme left end of the downward incline. What some may have interpreted to be a tail may actually be a sperm. So the whole picture resonates with the Sumerian account of man's creation, in my opinion. Unfortunately I am not in a position to read what the listed authors have already written about the hieroglyphs.
Monday, May 26, 2014
Maybe Inertia is the answer
Last night's show of the COSMOS series on National Geographic channel of DSTV was truly revealing. Michael Faraday was making discoveries in the field of Electricity and Magnetism, but because of his limited (or non-existant) mathematical background he could not express the observed phenomena in the form of mathematical equations.
In my view, Michael Faraday's postulations were in the realm of what we call "religion" today, because without mathematical formulae, he could only hope that his experiments would return the same result each time they were performed. And they did.
OK; some may consider it far-fetched to liken Faraday's experiments to religion because although he could not express his findings mathematically, he could nonetheless demonstrate the behaviour of his magnetic and electric materials to observers. I humbly submit that Faraday could do this only because the time required for his experiments to "mature" was infinitesimally small, compared to the time required for religious invocations to play out. If you are confused at this stage, don't worry, so am I.
I am confused because of Inertia. The phenomenon of Inertia cuts across material and non-material things/objects. Recall my earlier posting on how the continent of Antarctica reminds one of Tom and Jerry or the Road-runner and the Coyote? Those are material things whose behaviours vis-a-vis inertia are presumably explained by Newton's laws of motion. But inertia does not end there.
Society's behaviour exhibits characteristics typical of manifestations of inertia, but the related inertial behaviour takes much longer to play itself out. The most despicable tyrants take over countries, legally or otherwise. They subject their people to untold suffering, all the while thinking that the people either love them or are too afraid to forcefully get rid of them. But eventually social inertia asserts itself and the dictator is sent to the dustbins of history. Only those dictators who adapt their methods to the restorative reactions of social inertia last any significant time.
There is no country on earth which does not "cycle" its leadership. Various methods are employed - son or daughter succeeds father/grandfather; sister succeeds brother; a "place-holder" is installed while a son is being groomed. All these are exhibitions of social inertia. The opponents of the recycling may have a very good reason to oppose it, but they too acknowledge the futility of confronting social inertia at the wrong time.
In my view, one of the greatest acknowledgements of social inertia occurred when the Soviet Union came into being. This was a union based on a philosophy that negated religion, but if you examine the soviet flag (hammer and sickle) you can't help feeling that it looks like the Muslim crescent and an Orthodox cross. In other words even the anti-religious Bolsheviks could not help subliminally installing religious symbols on their banners to stave off negative reaction due to social inertia.
And so in my view, humanity's inability this far, to formulate a mathematical equation that cuts across material and non-material phenomena, and explains God and religion in terms of the principle of inertia, is no different from Michael Faraday's inability to formulate mathematical equations to explain his experimental observations in electricity and magnetism. We know that Faraday's experiments have since been mathematically explained; it is therefore foolhardy to deny that non-material Inertia (and God) may one day be mathematically explained.
In my view, Michael Faraday's postulations were in the realm of what we call "religion" today, because without mathematical formulae, he could only hope that his experiments would return the same result each time they were performed. And they did.
OK; some may consider it far-fetched to liken Faraday's experiments to religion because although he could not express his findings mathematically, he could nonetheless demonstrate the behaviour of his magnetic and electric materials to observers. I humbly submit that Faraday could do this only because the time required for his experiments to "mature" was infinitesimally small, compared to the time required for religious invocations to play out. If you are confused at this stage, don't worry, so am I.
I am confused because of Inertia. The phenomenon of Inertia cuts across material and non-material things/objects. Recall my earlier posting on how the continent of Antarctica reminds one of Tom and Jerry or the Road-runner and the Coyote? Those are material things whose behaviours vis-a-vis inertia are presumably explained by Newton's laws of motion. But inertia does not end there.
Society's behaviour exhibits characteristics typical of manifestations of inertia, but the related inertial behaviour takes much longer to play itself out. The most despicable tyrants take over countries, legally or otherwise. They subject their people to untold suffering, all the while thinking that the people either love them or are too afraid to forcefully get rid of them. But eventually social inertia asserts itself and the dictator is sent to the dustbins of history. Only those dictators who adapt their methods to the restorative reactions of social inertia last any significant time.
There is no country on earth which does not "cycle" its leadership. Various methods are employed - son or daughter succeeds father/grandfather; sister succeeds brother; a "place-holder" is installed while a son is being groomed. All these are exhibitions of social inertia. The opponents of the recycling may have a very good reason to oppose it, but they too acknowledge the futility of confronting social inertia at the wrong time.
In my view, one of the greatest acknowledgements of social inertia occurred when the Soviet Union came into being. This was a union based on a philosophy that negated religion, but if you examine the soviet flag (hammer and sickle) you can't help feeling that it looks like the Muslim crescent and an Orthodox cross. In other words even the anti-religious Bolsheviks could not help subliminally installing religious symbols on their banners to stave off negative reaction due to social inertia.
And so in my view, humanity's inability this far, to formulate a mathematical equation that cuts across material and non-material phenomena, and explains God and religion in terms of the principle of inertia, is no different from Michael Faraday's inability to formulate mathematical equations to explain his experimental observations in electricity and magnetism. We know that Faraday's experiments have since been mathematically explained; it is therefore foolhardy to deny that non-material Inertia (and God) may one day be mathematically explained.
Thursday, May 22, 2014
Jews/Baperi in Southern Africa
The DNA profile of the Lemba people of Southern Africa has been shown to be similar to that of Jews. I have argued that the Jews are an intergral component of the Cushite peoples whose principal workgroup occupation, during the Anunnaki building of Lalibela in present day Ethiopia, was to make sisal (and possibly jute) ropes. TO TWINE sisal strands and make rope is known as KU KOSHA in Kalanga
.
One possible pointer to the link between the Jews and the Lembas is in the names "Falasha Jews" from Ethiopia and "Mposi Lembas" of Zimbabwe and Botswana. I believe that "Falasha" is a corruption of the Kalanga noun "Balasha", meaning those who throw away (or lose). I know that the Kalanga noun "Mposi" is derived from the verb KU POSA meaning TO THROW/HURL. It is conceivable therefore that Mposi Lembas are not only Jews, but specifically Falasha Jews.
In addition to the Masunga Lembas (Baperi) of Botswana, we also have the Nswazwi Baperi. The latter is an interesting group, because while they are undoubtedly Lembas, they nevertheless have pointers to a Batota (Zulus, Xhosa, Swazi) identity about them. The first pointer is the name -Nswazwi. The second pointer is the name "Makuta", used in reference to a range of hills where they reside. However, the word "Makuta" actually means "fences" in Kalanga. It is synonymous with "Wuta" or "Wute" in the word "WuteNtota" for Ngunis/Hottentots.
And so the Nswazwi branch of the Southern African Jews must have assimilated Ngunis to a large extent. Alternatively, they may have arrived in Southern Africa earlier than the other Jews, and therefore been absorbed into the Nguni fence-making groups in order to impart their rope-making and application skills - Nswazwi wa pomba ngombe!
.
One possible pointer to the link between the Jews and the Lembas is in the names "Falasha Jews" from Ethiopia and "Mposi Lembas" of Zimbabwe and Botswana. I believe that "Falasha" is a corruption of the Kalanga noun "Balasha", meaning those who throw away (or lose). I know that the Kalanga noun "Mposi" is derived from the verb KU POSA meaning TO THROW/HURL. It is conceivable therefore that Mposi Lembas are not only Jews, but specifically Falasha Jews.
In addition to the Masunga Lembas (Baperi) of Botswana, we also have the Nswazwi Baperi. The latter is an interesting group, because while they are undoubtedly Lembas, they nevertheless have pointers to a Batota (Zulus, Xhosa, Swazi) identity about them. The first pointer is the name -Nswazwi. The second pointer is the name "Makuta", used in reference to a range of hills where they reside. However, the word "Makuta" actually means "fences" in Kalanga. It is synonymous with "Wuta" or "Wute" in the word "WuteNtota" for Ngunis/Hottentots.
And so the Nswazwi branch of the Southern African Jews must have assimilated Ngunis to a large extent. Alternatively, they may have arrived in Southern Africa earlier than the other Jews, and therefore been absorbed into the Nguni fence-making groups in order to impart their rope-making and application skills - Nswazwi wa pomba ngombe!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)