I wonder who Jacob was.

Before grinding grain into powder, we process the grain to remove the fibre/roughage. We  do not eat the roughage. Instead we often cook it and feed it to dogs and chickens. In Kalanga, roughage is called "ikuba", which is of course equivalent to "kuba". Still in Kalanga, to eat is "ku ja". The phrase "ja kuba" therefore means "eat roughage". This is the Kalanga rendition of the biblical name "Jacob".

Now, an interesting "coincidence" of sorts is that in Setswana language, which is a variant of Coptic/Sothu languages, roughage is called "moroko".

The Anunnaki, at one stage of their inhabitance of earth, fed on our faeces. If a human wanted to "be difficult" he/she would probably eat roughage so as to present as little food value as possible in his/her faeces. This would particularly irk the god Ra, who ordered people not to plough, but rather to eat meat; presumably to maximise protein in the Anunnaki "diet".

The scriptures tell us that Jacob, son of Isaac was often at loggerheads with "God", but they don't really explain why. Could it be that he consistently ate roughage in order to frustrate the Anunnaki ? More importantly, could the people of Morocco (moroko) be the real descendants of the biblical Jacob ?

Barwa are Ba-rua ?

And at this point I must acknowledge my possible mistake about Barwa being Ba-Ra. It seems most plausible that Barwa could infact be Ba-Rua, meaning "those who raise (cattle)". It makes sense that the Barwa called themselves by a name which is directly opposite that by which they referred to the people whose lands they invaded to graze their herds - Bakhwa.

Bakhwa = Bakgadi, not Basarwa

And so Roy Sesana, leader of the Bakhwa/Bakhoe organisation of First People of the Kalahari
(FPK) is most probably right when he says that the name Basarwa, used to refer to Bakhwa in
Setswana is a corrupted version of the Setswana phrase Ba-Sarua, meaning "those who do not
rear(or raise) animals".

You see, rearing cattle is a central economic activity of the Tswana people ever since the
founding of Khami/Nkami near Bulawayo by the Anunnaki. We have shown on this blog that the
Bangwato, Bakwena, Bangwaketse and Bakaa people originate from Khami. These people, who now
live in Botswana, used to be the herders and milkers of the animals  whose milk served as food for the Anunnaki.

What may have escaped notice by Kalanga speakers is that the historical inhabitans of Khami, a people refered to as "Botua" are in fact "Bothua/Bothuwa". Their name is derived from the Kalanga verb "Ku thuwa (ngombe)" meaning "To rear (cattle)". Thus they were known as "Bathuwa" in Kalanga.

Like all animal herders, Bathuwa had to find pasture for their herds when Khami fell, long after the Anunnaki left the scene. Pasture was readily available in the lands of Bakhwa, who were mostly hunter gatherers.

Thus the word "Basarwa" came in handy to clear the consciences of the Bathuwa, as the latter
moved to invade the lands of the Bakhwa to graze their herds.

Who made us, Kalangas ?

There is no concept of one God in Kalanga language. I am not surprised. The closest to a “one God concept” is the entity “Mwali”. However, as we have shown on this blog, the word “Mwali” extrapolates to “Mu hali”, which means “In the pot/womb”. That we are all made by Mwali, is indisputable!

The Kalanga bible carries the word “Ndzimu” as a translation of the English word “God”. However, the word “Ndzimu” undoubtedly refers to the Anunnaki, and this is why: The noun “Ndzimu” derives from the verb “KU DZIMA”, meaning “To cool (something down), or to extinguish (a fire)”.

We have shown on this blog that to survive the heat of planet Earth, the Anunnaki had to be cooled down in ice chambers in Southern Africa and by means of fans in Egypt. The human work group responsible for this demanding task was Bakhwa (Bushmen). The word “Ndzimu” therefore refers to none other than the Anunnaki.

It boggles the mind that when we (Africans) told the Christian missionaries and Muslim Arabs, that we were made by the Anunnaki, in the womb, they called us Kaffirs (unbelievers). Who were the real kaffirs, one may ask? Was it us who believed something that we had proof about, or was it they who believed they were made by some “ONE” God, without any proof whatsoever?

Is Scholz's star Nibiru ?

It seems quite natural to associate the planet Mars with the "mythical" planet Nibiru, from which the Anunnaki are supposed to have visited planet earth. This is because the word "Nibiru" sounds like a corruption of the Tswana word "n'hibidu" meaning "red". Mars, as we know, is also known as "the red planet". Thus, following the Tswana/Coptic/Sumerian family of languages, I concluded that Mars is indeed Nibiru.

As I have written in the past, there is a tiny, very delicate, bright red insect which appears after rains. As Kalanga-speaking kids, we used to call it "ndzimu", meaning "god". When I became aware of the saga involving the planet Nibiru (red?) and the Anunnaki gods, a few years ago, I came to the conclusion that the gods must have come from a red planet, wherever that is; and that therefore Mars is Nibiru.

However, there was a nagging problem at the back of my head - what has the planet Mars got to do with "not burning" ?

You see, in Anunnaki (proto)language the word "Si" means "fire". The (Italian?) word "Si", meaning "yes" is its direct derivative, originally meaning  that the Anunnaki rocket "agrees" to start/fire. The (Italian?) word shares this origin with its Russian couterpart - the word "Da", derived from the Kalanga word "Da", which means "to like /to accept" (to start?). In earliest Kalanga or Anunnaki (proto)language one probably said "ya si", meaning "it (the rocket) has fired/started".  It would seem that this is  the origin of the English word "yes".

One way of making a fire in nature is through friction. One wooden stick is rotated under pressure, against another stick until the generated friction produces fire. In Kalanga, this process is called "sika"; "si meaning "fire", and "ka", meaning "spirit".

So what has all this got to do with either Mars or Nibiru? In Kalanga, there is a star which ususally rises just before dawn, and is called "Masasi". The root of the word is "-sasi". The prefix "sa" means "not". Thus "-sasi" means "not burning". Indeed a spark is called "sasi" in Kalanga. The Kalanga word "Masasi" therefore means "the one that does not burn". I believe that the English word Mars is its derivative.

So, how does planet Mars "not burn" ?. I don't know, and I have been wondering about this until I heard about the discovery of the cosmic encounter between Scholz's star (with its red dwarf partner) and our solar system 70,000 years ago. A red dwarf doesn't burn - Masasi. There is yet another feature of Scholz's star that suggests that it could indeed be Nibiru. The ancient Maori heiroglyphic script on Pitcairn's island has a figure (6) that could possibly represent a double star system.  I have surmised that the Jewish "star of David" may well be a projection of that figure (6), with the two triangles intersecting.

The probability of Scholz's star (or a planet orbitting it) being Nibiru, is much higher than that of the red planet Mars.

I support "nut rage" South Korean lady

If someone like the South Korean executive Ms Cho, had been on the South Korean ferry, she would have forced it back into port when she found out that the captain was not at the wheel. Three hundred South Korean children would be alive today!

Panama

Very few people have the honor to be remembered beyond a thousand years; and yet memories of the things people say and do can live practically for ever. This leads to a situation where, with passage of time, peoples' deeds and words become "orphans", to use a common word-processing concept.  When this happens we assign our current "widows" to the orphans so formed and everybody is happy again. A lot of the pronouncements attributed to Churchill, Jesus Christ or Prophet Mohammed were not said by them, but by different (earlier, or even later) people altogether.

Last week I was watching TV when it was said that the name Panama originates from Christopher Columbus reaching Panama, thinking that he had reached Asia and so stopping there. While it is highly plausible that the events described led to the naming of Panama, it is highly unlikely that Christopher Columbus was the actor in the drama.

The word Panama seems to be a corruption of the Kalanga phrase "Pa nda ma", meaning "where I have stopped". If that is indeed the origin of the name Panama, as legend seems to confirm, then the words were said not by Christopher Columbus but by the Anunnaki god Toth himself. Toth (or Ningishzidda) was sent away from Egypt to America by his father Enki, to make way for his brother Marduk/Ra. The conclusion we can draw from this is that his influence did not extend westwards, all the way to Asia!