Monday, May 4, 2015

Who made us, Kalangas ?

There is no concept of one God in Kalanga language. I am not surprised. The closest to a “one God concept” is the entity “Mwali”. However, as we have shown on this blog, the word “Mwali” extrapolates to “Mu hali”, which means “In the pot/womb”. That we are all made by Mwali, is indisputable!

The Kalanga bible carries the word “Ndzimu” as a translation of the English word “God”. However, the word “Ndzimu” undoubtedly refers to the Anunnaki, and this is why: The noun “Ndzimu” derives from the verb “KU DZIMA”, meaning “To cool (something down), or to extinguish (a fire)”.

We have shown on this blog that to survive the heat of planet Earth, the Anunnaki had to be cooled down in ice chambers in Southern Africa and by means of fans in Egypt. The human work group responsible for this demanding task was Bakhwa (Bushmen). The word “Ndzimu” therefore refers to none other than the Anunnaki.

It boggles the mind that when we (Africans) told the Christian missionaries and Muslim Arabs, that we were made by the Anunnaki, in the womb, they called us Kaffirs (unbelievers). Who were the real kaffirs, one may ask? Was it us who believed something that we had proof about, or was it they who believed they were made by some “ONE” God, without any proof whatsoever?

Tuesday, March 17, 2015

Is Scholz's star Nibiru ?

It seems quite natural to associate the planet Mars with the "mythical" planet Nibiru, from which the Anunnaki are supposed to have visited planet earth. This is because the word "Nibiru" sounds like a corruption of the Tswana word "n'hibidu" meaning "red". Mars, as we know, is also known as "the red planet". Thus, following the Tswana/Coptic/Sumerian family of languages, I concluded that Mars is indeed Nibiru.

As I have written in the past, there is a tiny, very delicate, bright red insect which appears after rains. As Kalanga-speaking kids, we used to call it "ndzimu", meaning "god". When I became aware of the saga involving the planet Nibiru (red?) and the Anunnaki gods, a few years ago, I came to the conclusion that the gods must have come from a red planet, wherever that is; and that therefore Mars is Nibiru.

However, there was a nagging problem at the back of my head - what has the planet Mars got to do with "not burning" ?

You see, in Anunnaki (proto)language the word "Si" means "fire". The (Italian?) word "Si", meaning "yes" is its direct derivative, originally meaning  that the Anunnaki rocket "agrees" to start/fire. The (Italian?) word shares this origin with its Russian couterpart - the word "Da", derived from the Kalanga word "Da", which means "to like /to accept" (to start?). In earliest Kalanga or Anunnaki (proto)language one probably said "ya si", meaning "it (the rocket) has fired/started".  It would seem that this is  the origin of the English word "yes".

One way of making a fire in nature is through friction. One wooden stick is rotated under pressure, against another stick until the generated friction produces fire. In Kalanga, this process is called "sika"; "si meaning "fire", and "ka", meaning "spirit".

So what has all this got to do with either Mars or Nibiru? In Kalanga, there is a star which ususally rises just before dawn, and is called "Masasi". The root of the word is "-sasi". The prefix "sa" means "not". Thus "-sasi" means "not burning". Indeed a spark is called "sasi" in Kalanga. The Kalanga word "Masasi" therefore means "the one that does not burn". I believe that the English word Mars is its derivative.

So, how does planet Mars "not burn" ?. I don't know, and I have been wondering about this until I heard about the discovery of the cosmic encounter between Scholz's star (with its red dwarf partner) and our solar system 70,000 years ago. A red dwarf doesn't burn - Masasi. There is yet another feature of Scholz's star that suggests that it could indeed be Nibiru. The ancient Maori heiroglyphic script on Pitcairn's island has a figure (6) that could possibly represent a double star system.  I have surmised that the Jewish "star of David" may well be a projection of that figure (6), with the two triangles intersecting.

The probability of Scholz's star (or a planet orbitting it) being Nibiru, is much higher than that of the red planet Mars.

Thursday, February 12, 2015

I support "nut rage" South Korean lady

If someone like the South Korean executive Ms Cho, had been on the South Korean ferry, she would have forced it back into port when she found out that the captain was not at the wheel. Three hundred South Korean children would be alive today!

Wednesday, January 28, 2015

Panama

Very few people have the honor to be remembered beyond a thousand years; and yet memories of the things people say and do can live practically for ever. This leads to a situation where, with passage of time, peoples' deeds and words become "orphans", to use a common word-processing concept.  When this happens we assign our current "widows" to the orphans so formed and everybody is happy again. A lot of the pronouncements attributed to Churchill, Jesus Christ or Prophet Mohammed were not said by them, but by different (earlier, or even later) people altogether.

Last week I was watching TV when it was said that the name Panama originates from Christopher Columbus reaching Panama, thinking that he had reached Asia and so stopping there. While it is highly plausible that the events described led to the naming of Panama, it is highly unlikely that Christopher Columbus was the actor in the drama.

The word Panama seems to be a corruption of the Kalanga phrase "Pa nda ma", meaning "where I have stopped". If that is indeed the origin of the name Panama, as legend seems to confirm, then the words were said not by Christopher Columbus but by the Anunnaki god Toth himself. Toth (or Ningishzidda) was sent away from Egypt to America by his father Enki, to make way for his brother Marduk/Ra. The conclusion we can draw from this is that his influence did not extend westwards, all the way to Asia!

Monday, November 24, 2014

India

There is little to say about India, because India is an un-corrupted Kalanga word. If there is any corruption, it is in the difference between the sounds "ya" and "a". Surely, the two sounds are interchangeable?

The Kalanga verb "KU DIYA" means "TO TEACH". (I submit that "KU DIA" is another way of writing the same verb). A teacher is therefore "Ndiya" or Ndiyi". Ancient Kalanga, like Nguni, used the prefix "i-" as part of the noun. Therefore "i-ndiya" or "i-ndia" or for that matter "i-ndiyi" means "teacher". In mordern Kalanga "i-ndia" is a sentence, meaning "it's a teacher".

This strongly suggests that the Anunnaki used Indians as the "gurus" that the latter still are today.

Saturday, November 15, 2014

Maybe not so wrong, after all!

I made a claim which I later retracted, that the Chinese are "Ba-Chena", meaning "Whites" in Kalanga language. My reason for retraction was that originally, all humans were of one colour anyway, and that human groups were named solely according to what they did in society. That remains my conviction.

However, some human groups were dressed in a manner appropriate for what they did. Such were the Chinese, who were responsible for producing and handling drinking water, and whom the Anunnaki consequently dressed in white.  As a result the Kalanga word for "white" was derived from the word for Chinese, and not vice versa.

The Kalanga verb for "To dig" is "Ku tsha". Unfortunately I cannot think of any English word with the sound "tsh-". It is an aspired "ts" as in "Bots". The Anunnaki word for "water/rain" is "ina". On Mars, "ina" (plural - mana) meant "frozen carbon dioxide" which rained from heaven. On earth the same word was used to refer to water/rain. And so the Chinese became "Ba-Tsha-ina", meaning "water diggers".

Chinese languages, and Bushman languages have a lot in common, and they all refer to water as "Tshaa or tshae" or something similar. As time passed, some human groups dropped the "tsha" from the name for Chinese, leaving only "Ba-ina". Interestingly, "Ba-ina" is the Russian word for "war"!

The Kalanga word for "white" is "chena". The Kalanga truncated the full phrase "che-ina" meaning "the water one", that is "the water person/practitioner". Therefore the Kalanga word for "white" was derived from the colour of Chinese working uniform. Yes, this means I was wrong for suggesting that the source of the chicken is the egg, rather than the egg being the source of the chicken; I mean the chicken being the source of... whatever!

In previous posts I have identified the Anunnaki prefix - "bel-"  as meaning "to dig". I still stand by that. However it seems that "bel-" was used more in reference to mining and stone masonry than to simply digging into the ground for water. There was, nonetheless a confusion in the use of the two words - "tsha" and "bel-". The German name "Berlin" which is said to mean "swamp" may be testimony to this confusion - "Bel-ina ?".

Even for me, who understand ZERO Chinese, the trace of Kalanga language in China is unmistakable. If you speak Kalanga, and ever watched a Chinese panda bear eating bamboo, you would realise that the bear couldn't have been called anything else but a PANDA. The Kalanga word "panda" means just that - crunching something hard. In the case of pain, it means "throbbing" as in a "throbbing head-ache".

Monday, November 3, 2014

Jerusalem

This week's entry in the column "Digging Tswana Roots" by I.M. Leteane of Pitoronet.com, together with this week's entry in the column "This Earth my Brother" by Benson C. Saili in the WeekEndPost newspaper, seem most appropriate, given the current unrest in Jerusalem.

I have been reminded of an anomaly pointed out to me on the Internet. The Bible, at 2 Chronicles, Chapter 14, verse 9 states:
"And there came out against them Zerah the Ethiopian with an host of a thousand thousand; and three hundred chariots; and came unto Maresshah."
Most significantly, verse 15 states:
"They smote also the tents of cattle, and carried away sheep and camels in abundance, and returned to Jerusalem."
Now, my question is this:
How did they by-pass Egypt, to get from Ethiopia to Jerusalem ?. At the very least they should have negotiated a military  path past "Upper Egypt", before embarking on the journey back to Jerusalem. We know how long that journey, accross the Red Sea, had taken Moses to complete - 40 years or so in the Wilderness.

Please shed some light, will you!