Friday, December 6, 2013

Lalibela - Ethiopia

It seems to me that the rock-hewn churches of Lalibela provided an ideal environment in which to hide the Anunnaki shems (rockets). If, as seems likely, the churches were hewn by the Anunnaki, and one of them is called Biet-Lehem, I am confused about which preceded the other - Lalibela or "the Holy Land".

Friday, November 15, 2013

Internet Access Problems

It may be a while before my next post - there's not much one can do with 20 - 30 kbps coming down a Huawei 3G wireless modem.

Whatever the reason for the constriction, I think it will take some time to undo.

Sunday, October 20, 2013

What national language?

The discourse around the teaching of Ikalanga language has been shrouded in a haze of lies and deceit. Why this is so is quite simple to explain. People who would not deserve the privileges they currently enjoy were merit to be the only criterion for advancement, now feel threatened by new exposes concerning the true status of languages spoken in Botswana, and are therefore lashing out wildly in all directions in an attempt to save their ill-gotten privileges.

What we are saying is that Setswana is not, has never been, the national language of Botswana. The national language of Botswana, post-Independence is English. The declaration by the Setswana speakers that Setswana is the national language is a fraud; it never reflected the reality on the ground before the Europeans arrived in Southern Africa. It does not reflect the reality even now, despite close to 50 years of forcing Setswana down the throats of the population and manipulating statistics to justify the fraud.

In the Telegraph newspaper of October 16th Dr. Otlogetswe writes in his column, The Linguist Chair:
 “Science is a systematic enterprise based on observation, testable explanations & claims and reproducible experiments. Glaring observable occurrences have been seriously and repeatedly ignored.”
He continues further down in the same article:
“Botswana has a very small population and has a high linguistic diversity. The country has 28 languages spoken by about 2 million people. Setswana as the national language is spoken by over 80 % of the country as either a first, second or .....”

An incident that obviously qualifies as “science” according to Dr. Otlogetswe’s definition, and that seriously questions his statistics happened last week. I went into an Election registration booth. A Kalanga-born-and-speaking girl assisted me. I spoke in Kalanga, but she answered back in Setswana. When I switched to English, she answered back in English. I never said anything in Setswana language in that office. At the end of my registration she handed me the record of the exercise. I was shocked to find that she had recorded that the “interview” had been conducted in Setswana! I asked her why she had written that and her answer was that they had been instructed that for all “locals” they should write Setswana language!

You see, these are the blatant lies that the Setswana speakers tell the world about the linguistic diversity of our country. The compulsion upon our people to learn Setswana language robs our kids of the chance to develop their English language skills. It denies them the chance to broaden their world view. It creates intellectually stunted beings.

What we are saying to the Tswana speakers is that if such stunting is the price we have to pay for having a “national” language other than English, let that “national” language be the language we speak from birth – Ikalanga. Keep the Setswana language that you speak from birth as your national language; we don’t need it.

Saturday, October 19, 2013

And who are the Hottentots?

There is nothing derogatory about the word Hottentots.The word refers to the inhabitants of the Cape colony of South Africa.The name does not originate from the Cape colonists either. The word "Hottentot" is equivalent to "Nguni".

Recall that the Nguni, among whom we normally count the Xhosa, the Zulu, the Swazi, were responsible for mending enclosures with branches during the Anunnaki days. Such enclosures consisted in the main, of cattle-holding pans.

Well, the correct spelling of the Kalanga word "Hottentot" is "Wute-ntota" which unpacks as follows:

Wute: a plural of "likuta" meaning "enclosure" or "fence".
Ntota: a mender. It derives from the verb KU TOTA, meaning TO MEND.

So, "Hottentots" is just a misspelling of who they really are; nothing derogatory at all!

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Head swimming...

Sometimes it's best to let sleeping dogs lie, as the English say. You see, that matter about "kissing the ground" that some god of ancient Egypt allegedly did may not be quite accurate. Suffice it to say that we know how the Anunnaki fed; we know what the responsibility of the Spanish was (Ba-Esi-panya); and we know one or two words of Spanish, which undoubtedly have their origin from Kalanga language. That's it, figure the rest out for yourself!

Now back to the real topic of tonight. I have always believed that by "Nibiru" the Anunnaki were referring to Mars, partly because the colour of Mars (red) is called "nhibidu" in Sotho/Tswana/Coptic language. In light of the Ethiopian stamp below I am now inclined to believe Zecharia Sitchin, but with a qualification. What looks like a rocket pedestal HAS WINGS, just like the supposed elongated-orbit planet Nibiru. It also looks like it may have opened up to send the rocket/s on their way.

So maybe there indeed is a planet Nibiru orbiting the Sun very eccentrically as claimed. Or maybe the Anunnaki were spit from some celestial master ship from the stars. Even more incredibly, maybe a parallel universe to our own splashed them onto ours.

It's hard to know. Maybe someone will be so kind as to clarify.

Reasonable to assume safety from copyright!

An Ethiopian stamp with Anunnaki rocket

Monday, October 7, 2013

Hard to imagine.

It is not easy to stop asking oneself “Just when and how did the Tswana/Sotho language come into contact with Kalanga language?” As I trace back towards Egypt, the two languages seem to have existed side by side during the time of the gods.

Sometimes languages differ in strangely consistent ways. The Nguni languages (Xhosa; Zulu;Swathi) have retained the preposition as part of a noun: A car in Kalanga is “Mota” while in Nguni it’s “i-mota”. In Kalanga “i-mota” means “it’s a car”. The interesting part though, is that old Kalanga of the type spoken during the Anunnaki days, seems to have been more faithful to the Nguni format than to present day Kalanga format. Instead of calling the Anunnaki “Lui”, it referred to them as “i-Lui”.

The Nguni format seems to have also been used in reference to the prevailing god/s in Egypt. The reader is of course now familiar with the omission by ancient scribes of the vowel, thus rendering our god “Ptah” as most likely, “Puta”, a Kalanga word meaning “Kiss”. Here is where the Nguni format “i-something“ comes in. Instead of referring to Egypt as “Gi-Puta”, meaning “kissing the earth”, it referred to Egypt as “i-Gi-Puta”, meaning the same thing – “kissing the earth”. In other words at the celestial level “Egypt” is a corrupted reference to “i-Gi-Puta”, an extra-terrestrial “god” who seems to have liked kissing the ground.

 And here is where it becomes realy interesting: the Tswana/Sotho (read Coptic) word for people who kiss is “ba-Suni”. Yes, what I am saying is that Sunnis had their origin in Egypt long before Islam, as a religion, existed in Saudi Arabia. And in case you think you have heard it all, cross over to Ethiopia and observe that the “Christian” churches hewn out of bedrock at Lalibela, may have been constructed by ET’s as well.


The Anunnaki seem to have called water “La” from which we get “L’eau” in French and in other languages. If so, “Lalibela” in both Kalanga and Tswana/Sotho means “water boiling”. It makes you wonder if some technology using what looked like “boiling water” may have been used to hew the churches out. There is another reason to suspect that the ET’s did the hewing: On a huge human-head-shaped block in Lalibela is a clear picture of an Anunnaki rocket rising. However the rocket is cleverly shaped to resemble a nose, and its pedestal to resemble a mouth. But in between the pedestal and the rocket is a wavy form which looks like the letter W written sideways. That letter is the shape of part of the base of the hewn churches, AS SEEN FROM ABOVE THE CHURCHES. Next to that letter, and in-between the rocket/nose and the mouth/pedestal are two little circular objects, which may be planets or whatever else the naughty Anunnaki wanted us to think they were! Google Tiya stones for other such stones in ancient Ethiopa.

AND SO CHRISTIANITY IN ETHIOPIA MAY BE MUCH OLDER THAN JESUS CHRIST HIMSELF, which brings us back to the infant Nshakazhogwe, left behind in Southern Africa by its mother when she went to marry an Egyptian pharaoh. 

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Anunnaki rocket colour

Language, specifically Kalanga language, can be used to reverse-engineer human experiences during the Anunnaki presence on earth. We know for example that the Anunnaki rockets looked like a maize cob; indeed we have their picture on the Easter Island Rapa Nui Moai Birdmen Petroglyphs.

But what colour were they? They were most likely Red, just like the planet Mars. The clue is in the name “Ngama”, a reddish antelope in Southern Africa, whose English name I unfortunately do not know. The animal is called “Kgama” in the Setswana language. I strongly suspect it is the antelope that knocked down a cyclist in a video that went viral on the internet. Some people think (wrongfully, I think) that our President’s surname is a corruption of that word.

Well, the Kalanga name for that animal seems to be a combination of two words, which unpack as follows:

KU NGA: a verb, meaning TO RESEMBLE.
KU MA: a verb, meaning TO STAND (UPRIGHT); from which the full name CHIMA meaning a ROCKET, together with its short form MA, were derived.

And so the Kalanga name of that animal “ngama” translates to “resembling a rocket”. Since we already know what the shape of the rockets resembled, the new resemblance must be a colour resemblance, i.e. reddish.

Sunday, September 1, 2013

White, how so?

I attach absolutely no significance to the colour of a person, save to recognise where his/her ancestry last resided. I say last resided because human beings keep moving in and out of the Antarctic Ozone hole exposure – the primary cause of blackness. Therefore some of today’s black people evolved from white ancestors, while some of today’s white people evolved from black ancestors. I have no way of knowing whether the original Adam, an African was black or white; a lot depends, I suppose on the colour of the Ape from whose egg he was fashioned, as well as the colour of the Anunnaki  whose sperm was used. There are many pointers that suggest that the Anunnakis were black bird-like beings and not the “tall blue-eyed, Nordic types” we read about in many alien research documents.

1. The Rapanui Moahi Birdmen petroglyphs potray them as birds.
2. The Zimbabwe soapstones potray them as birds.
3. The Mapungu, as they were referred to at Mapungubwe are birds.
4. They were called Khwizi (now meaning sheep), a word strikingly similar to Kiwis of New Zealand.
5. Kiwis are large birds, as we all know.
6. The Bahumbe people, close relatives of Jews (kewes) call themselves “phou thema”, which means “black ostritches” in Kalanga language.
7. Coming as they were from a high radiation planet Mars, they had to be black to survive. This point is very important because it explains why there are no land animals in Antarctica. Camouflage against the white ice would necessitate animals to be white, while radiation through the Ozone hole would necessitate the opposite – that animals be black. The result – no land animals in Antarctica.

I recall a comment that was made by one religious person, to the effect that if intelligent aliens came from Mars, then such intelligent life must have originated from earth, been transported to Mars, and finally brought (itself) back to earth. The bird-like characteristics of the Anunnaki make me wonder if they might have been descendants of dinosaurs who were whisked away from the cataclysm that wiped most of them out, by Good Samaritan Reptilians. In other words, the Anunnaki may have been “fashioned” from dinosaurs by other Extra-terrestrials, and dumped on Mars with enough intelligence to know that they came from earth! Just a thought, I warned you that I am neither a scientist nor a researcher.    

Friday, August 30, 2013

ThwaMambo

In the post entitled “Feeling like a sparrow” sometime in December 2012, I wrote:

How did “Anu” become “Ato”?. How did “nambo” meaning “a step” become “thambo”?. I suspect the Draco Reptilians forced people to spit (Apthu!) when talking about King Anu.

Well, I now think it was not the Draco Reptillians who “forced” people to spit; at least not directly. There is a people in Southern Africa, possibly in South Africa herself, called the Thwamambo. The Kalanga word unpacks as follows:
Ku thwa: meaning TO SPIT
Mambo: meaning KING.


And so these were the people who basically changed Ikalanga language.

Saturday, July 20, 2013

Gizzida

Now that the orgy of celebration over my “...troubles with this and that...” have subsided, I would like to correct a few misconceptions. Although I do not know whether the Anunnaki spoke Kalanga before they flew towards earth, I do know that they spoke Kalanga after landing on earth. I also know that all humanity associated with the Anunnaki initially spoke Kalanga language.

In an earlier post I showed that the Sumerian cuneiform sound “sh-“, as in “shems”, meaning -rockets, was mistranslated. It should have been correctly translated as “ch-“, as in the Kalanga word “chima”, meaning -a rocket. From this, one can see that the correct pronunciation of Ningishzida was NinGiChizwida. This was the name of the Anunnaki god, Enki’s genius son.

It is also my name (in a way) and it unpacks as follows:

Nin(Gi): the younger one (on earth). This was my “Lemba/Jewish” grandmother’s name. She re-formatted it without changing the meaning, and gave it to me when I was born, more than 60 years ago.

Chizwida: loving/proud of him/her self. This has been my blogging persona from “ZWIDEnkalanga” to “NkalangaUnoZWIDA”. Followers of forums dot gov.bw will be aware of course that I only became aware of the phenomenon of the Illui (Anunnaki) long after I assumed the persona.

I appreciate that the majority of readers will laugh this revelation off as BS, especially considering that I am supposed to be “anonymous”; however I am aware that many people, including the ever seeing big brother, know my true identity. To these I say go on, check out my claims.

The reason I have revealed this is to stress that it would be a great mistake to dismiss Ben Saili’s writings on the Illuminati’s secret science of onomatology out of hand. As Ben remarked when writing about the origins of the name “Kennedy”: names can kill you, folks.

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Weird judgment; really weird!

There are things I can’t understand about this Zimmerman trial. Zimmerman is a law-enforcement officer. He saw a man “just walking about...when it’s raining”, not an offence by any stretch of the imagination. Did the jurors ask themselves: WHY then did he contact the police dispatcher?

OK, let’s say he had a good reason to contact the police dispatcher. Was the reason, to ask for advice or reinforcements? As a law-enforcement officer, what does the LAW REQUIRE him to do, once he gets the advice he is seeking? If the law requires him to follow the advice, then he is guilty as hell for disobeying the law, leading to A FIGHT, and death of an innocent man. If the law is silent on how he should proceed after getting the advice, then the law is to blame for Trayvon Martin’s death. Of course if it’s reinforcements Zimmerman was asking for, he would have been expected to wait in his car as advised, until they arrived, instead of STARTING A FIGHT.

I wonder if the jurors asked themselves WHY the police dispatcher told Zimmerman “not to follow Trayvon Martin, but to stay in his car”. Was that perhaps a legal requirement, given the circumstances as reported, and the law-enforcement status of the reporter, Zimmerman? If it was a legal requirement, how then did Zimmerman’s actions NOT contribute to TM’s death?

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Did they speak Kalanga?


The trouble with being wrong is that you can only say “I was wrong” when you know what is right. I don’t know if the Anunnaki spoke Kalanga language; I previously said that they did. So, was I wrong?  I leave it to the reader to decide for him/her self. What if it later turns out that they did after all, speak Kalanga?

In this regard I must take my hat off to I.M. Leteane of Pitoronet dot com who, in his Mmegi newspaper column “Digging Tswana Roots”, never claimed knowledge of what language the Anunnaki spoke, save to say they spoke a PROTOLANGUAGE of sorts.  Leteane is right. He will be right even if it is later confirmed that indeed they spoke Kalanga language!

Using language to understand how man/society began is rather like using light to understand how the universe began. As you approach the big bang all sorts of crazy things start happening. Cause and effect become hard to differentiate. As a layman whose understanding of Physics is based on online news outlets, I cannot say much more about the big bang, but I suppose you get the drift!
 
So many Kalanga words originated from the physical presence of the Anunnaki on earth, that one may be forgiven for thinking that they (Anunnaki) spoke Kalanga too. But how could they have spoken Kalanga if the things they were “speaking” about were only here on earth, and not where they (Anunnaki) came from? Presumably then, only the things that they brought with them will bear names in the language that they spoke. Principal among such things are the rockets that the Anunnaki used to reach earth. Many Kalanga words revolve around the Anunnaki rockets, so much so that it becomes difficult to know whether the rockets reached earth under control of the language, or whether the language sprang up among us (cloned monkeys) as a result of our trance-like fascination with the rockets. In other words, cause and effect become blurred, language-wise!

KU MA:  verb, meaning TO STAND (UPRIGHT)
The Sumerian tablets call Anunnaki rockets – shems. The reader is reminded that ancient scribes often omitted the final vowel in a word. So, a shem could be shema or shemi or even shemu. It is my contention that the word shem is a mistranslation of the sound “cheemy” or “cheemer”, which sounds are written “chimi” or “chima” or alternatively “tjimi” or “tjima” in Kalanga language.  All these nouns are derived from the infinitive verb “ku ma” meaning “to stand (upright)”. An Anunnaki rocket was therefore called “chimi” or “chima” which are pronounced as “cheemy” or “cheemer”, respectively.

KU DUMA: verb, two meanings - TO AGREE and TO MAKE RUNNIG SOUND (ENGINE)
In Kalanga the “D” is normally pronounced like a Russian “D” (tongue flat on palate) and not like an English “D” (only tongue’s tip touching palate).  However the word “duma” is pronounced both with the Russian “D”, when it means TO MAKE A ROARING SOUND LIKE RUNNING ENGINE OR THUNDER; and with the English “D” sound, when it means TO AGREE. I submit that the latter meaning is what motivated the naming of the Russian Parliament – a place where legislators AGREE TOGETHER.
In both meanings, the word “duma” however, originates from the Anunnaki  rockets  STARTING, or put differently, AGREEING TO RUN:  “DU” for the sound and “MA” for STANDING (rocket).

KU NGA: verb, meaning TO RESEMBLE.
The Kalanga infinitive verb “ku nga”, meaning “to resemble” was appended as a suffix to Anunnaki items such as “chima” meaning a rocket, or Anunnaki acts such as “ku wa” meaning “to fall”. The results were “chimanga” meaning a maize cob, which resembles an Anunnaki rocket (see EASTER ISLAND RAPA NUI MOAI BIRDMAN PETROGLYPHS at Dreamstime dot com) and “wenga” meaning a parrot, which facially resembles the Anunnaki, and is able like the Anunnaki, to speak.

The “panga” is a familiar tool associated with Africans. The Kalanga verb “ku pa” means “to give”. Therefore a “panga” looks (nga) like something which is used to give or proffer something to another person, such as a spatula. At this point you find yourself in a knot. The above suggests that our use of the spatula predated our use of the panga! But how could this be possible if, even as monkeys, we used sharpened cutting tools made of stone? Where was the spatula then? I think the answer is obvious – we did not directly “develop” out of the monkey. We “developed” out of something else; something which introduced the spatula to us BEFORE we came across, or invented the panga. Just a thought, at this point I do not want to speculate on a “spatula” being “chipa; tola”, meaning a tool from which you take, when GIVEN. 

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Anunnaki and us


Sometimes one feels almost overwhelmed by the unexplained issues in the Anunnaki saga. We know that they called themselves “pkhizi” or “khwizi” (depending on dialect), meaning “home dried up” in Kalanga language. We also know that “khwizi” subsequently came to mean “sheep”in the same language. We also know that some people are said to have called themselves “kewes” in the ancient past, and that the name “kewes” has metamorphosed into present day “Jews”. It is, of course clear that the name “kewes” and the word “Khwizi” are one and the same word; same pronunciation, same meaning. In other words, present-day Jews are laying claim to being descendants of the Anunnaki.

The question that arises then is “So, who is not a Jew?” To hold that there is anyone who is not a Jew suggests that there are people who, unlike the “Jews”, are not descendants of the Anunnaki. But is this possible?

On one hand it could be possible. The alphabet that I am using as I write this is a Kalanga alphabet, since the names of the letters are Kalanga words. If, as seems likely, this alphabet originated during the Anunnaki presence on earth, and if the Anunnaki created us all, why then was the alphabet not adopted by all humanity? Indeed why was it not even adopted by those who still call themselves “Jews” to this day?

On the other hand the Anunnaki may have genetically cloned us and then bred us like domestic animals. This is suggested by the name Switzerland. Given that EngLAND is Land of Ba-ENGI (nurses) and SwaziLAND is Land of Ba-SWAZWI (tree branches), it seems plausible that SwitzerLAND is Land of Ba-SWIIDZI (mating enablers). The word Ba-Swiidzi derives from the Kalanga verb “ku swiila”, meaning “to fu*k”. The Swiss were therefore responsible for selecting who mates with whom in the Anunnaki-controlled world.
Wherever the Anunnaki “camped”, human nations subsequently sprung up in strict correspondence to, and in compliance with, various labour tasks. In other words labour was the basic social fabric of society then. Was there another? Did religion exist?

Last Spring I attended a funeral gathering where a priest wearing the Zion Christian church’s five-pointed star, led prayers. The man mesmerised everybody with his eloquence and deep knowledge of Kalanga language. But it was clear to those of us who have been made aware of the Sumerian tablets, that the man was praising Enki, although he called him “God”. The priest called God “Dibintibi, lishanganyoka gwaka pomba mu datha”. The phrase translates as follows:
Dibintibi: The great one; the deep one.
Lishanganyoka: a non-poisonous dark grey snake with two white stripes running its entire length.
Gwaka pomba mu: which is coiled around the
Datha: anthill
The priest therefore called God, “You the Great one; the snake that is coiled around the anthill”. One could rightly say that the priest was praying to Enki, as his God.

Before the Europeans colonised Africa, the Kalangas generally worshipped a peculiar God whom they called Mwali or Muali. Muali is responsible for giving people rain in the Southern African semi-desert. He resides at a certain hill, where he receives presents and food items from his emissaries/priests. Many writers have sought to identify the origin of the Muali religion. Some, including this blogger, have speculated in the past that Muali must be somehow connected with the Allah of Islam. It now doesn’t look that way, at least not to this blogger. An analysis of the word Muali reveals that it could be a corruption of the phrase “mu hali” meaning “in the pot”. The word “hali” means “a cooking pot”, while “ghali” suggests “a big cooking pot”. It would seem that the name for the Irish (Gaelic) derives from the huge cooking pot that they are associated with.
There is an alternate meaning for both “hali” and “ghali”; not only in Kalanga language but in other languages as well – it means a woman’s birth canal or womb. From this we have such sayings in English as “a bun in the oven” or the Kalanga language “Mu hali” or “Muali/Mwali”. What we are seeing here is that the religious doctrine that we inherited from the Anunnaki decreed that GOD IS IN THE WOMB –Mu hali. The various (combatant) religions that subsequently developed are our own creations, attempts to seize power for ourselves and our hangers-on. If God is in the womb, or in the pussy (as one might say), then maybe the Russian band Pussy Riot should not have been punished so severely.

Kalanga Mzilikazi

So honourable Nhlahla Simon needs do more than just plagiarize my posts on forums dot gov dot bw. He must understand that no one is disputing the heroics of his King Mzilikazi (or should I say Nzi Lukadzi). Mzilikazi was a brave Kalanga warrior. In Kalanga we have a saying – “Tjo kumbudzwa kanyi  ngo sunugwa”. The saying can be unpacked as follows:

Tjo: It, as in “it gets reminded...”
Kumbudzwa: be reminded, as in “it gets reminded...”
Kanyi: of home, as in “it gets reminded of home”
 Ngo sunugwa: by castration, as in “it gets reminded of home by castration”.

The Kalanga saying above means that it’s only when a stray cat gets castrated at its new home that it will head back to the home it deserted. When King Shaka of the Zulus decided to punish Mzilikazi for some cattle rustling, only then did Mzilikazi think of Nkami. By heading for what is now known as Bulawayo, Mzilikazi was actually heading back home to Nkami, in case you didn’t know!  

Friday, April 19, 2013

And who are the Ngunis?

OK, the Xosas, Zulus and Swathis of Southern Africa are called Ngunis. What was their role during the Anunnaki days? Exactly that - Guni (meaning wood) people. The key lies in the name Swaziland. In Kalanga language the word "Swazwi" means "a felled tree or branch". The word "Guni" means "a wooden log/branch". It would seem then that the Nguni people were responsible either for constructing cattle-holding pans with tree branches at Nkami near Bulawayo, or for supplying the wood that was used for constructing huts on and around Mapungubwe Mesa.

They definitely had nothing to do with "priesthood" or "Bangoni" as ZwideNkalanga erroneously thought.

Saturday, March 23, 2013

I will not vote in 2014 either, unless...


[This post rightly belongs to the blog myikalanga dot blogspot dot com, but seeing as the blog is still “under development” I thought it will be OK if I temporarily slot the post here!]

President Ian Khama took a conscious and deliberate decision not to read Botswana newspapers. Of course he reads (akin to editing) the Government mouthpieces – Dailiy News etc. However, nowhere have I come across a reference to him (by the notorious Sameosi Mokgethiwa of the WeekendPost) as “the one who does not read”. After all why should it matter “what” the president does not read, when it doesn’t matter “in what kind of vote” the BNF president does not take part!

In one of the local papers recently, a Botswana Member of Parliament (MP) who was an observer at the just ended Kenyan Presidential elections was quoted as saying that there are things that Botswana can learn from the Kenyan elections. I can’t remember what those things are, but I do remember that USE OF TRANSPARENT BALLOT BOXES is not one of them. For some reason the MP seems not to consider that Botswana should emulate Kenya in that aspect of the election. I was not at the Kenyan elections but I saw the Kenyan transparent ballot boxes on TV.

Unfortunately, the TV did not show whether the Kenyan ballot boxes were transported, prior to counting, and in the company of no one else but the Police, to a central counting “hall”. If they were, then our observer MP rightly did not recommend that we learn this from Kenya, as this is standard practice in Botswana.

Well, Sameosi Mokgethiwa has got himself one more object of ridicule, if the 2014 general elections in Botswana will not satisfy both those two conditions:
1.      The use of Transparent ballot boxes
2.    . The opening of ballot boxes and counting of votes BEFORE MOVING THE BOXES.

Unless the above two conditions are met, I will not vote either, in the 2014 General elections.   

Thursday, February 28, 2013

Back to Ikalanga language.


It is gratifying to note that some erstwhile advocates of “Setswana is the only NATIONAL language of Batswana” have now toned down their hysteria to the point of acknowledging that there exist other equally “indigenous” languages in Botswana.  The journey has not been easy.
Ikalanga language , as can be expected from the language of the Anunnaki, carries the history of humanity. This is not to say that Ikalanga language answers all the fundamental questions regarding humanity’s existence. No; far from it. The language merely helps us to understand the Sumerian account better. For example, did man exist in his/her current form before the Anunnaki arrived on earth? The Sumerian tablets, courtesy of Zacharia Sitchin, say “NO”.

One Ikalanga language word, the name of a village about 50 Km west of Gaborone, the capital of Botswana, seems to corroborate the Sumerian tablets’ account. The village is called “Molepolole”, a corruption of the Ikalanga sentence “Mu li pulule”.  The sentence “Mu li pulule” is an instruction, and can be broken down as follows:
Mu: Do, as in “Do come here”.
Li: It, as in “Do milk it”
Ku pulula: a verb, equivalent verb in English is unknown to me. But let me explain. I believe the verb “to pull” is a derivation. It means pulling something (like leaves or small berries) off a retainer (such as a twig).
The people who now reside in the village Molepolole were generally milkers and cow minders, during the Anunnaki days. The instruction “Mu li pulule (ilo zhamu)” instructs them to grab a cow’s teats and pull downwards so that milk comes out. For humans to have been taught such a basic skill suggests that these were the first humans to emerge from monkey status!

In the west of Botswana is a city called Ghanzi. The Tswana-speaking chauvinists have been battling to Tswanalise its name, and change it to Gantsi. So far, thanks to the inhabitants of Ghanzi, the chauvinists have failed. Ghanzi is actually Ghaa Nzi, meaning “Ice home”. It would seem that this is where the Anunnakis first landed on earth, and used the sun’s energy to try and simulate conditions on Mars. The people who inhabit this area are called “Bakhwa” in IKalanga. The word “Bakhwa” may mean “inhabitants of the dried out area”.  Considering that the Anunnaki left Mars because she had dried out, it makes sense that they would have first wanted to occupy a place on earth that shows signs of having dried out too – the Makgadikgadi Salt Pans or the Kalahari expanse. The claim by the people of this area to be the First People of the Kalahari (apologies to FPK) may be true after all! There is also evidence that Bahumbe, who are the people who were digging toilet holes on Mapungubwe hill, were imported from the Kalahari as Makaukau. In other words when skilled personnel were required to dig toilet holes, the Anunnaki brought such people in from the Kalahari, either to do the digging themselves, or to teach the Bahumbe how it’s done. Long live “Ghanzi”; down with “Gantsi”.

Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Mass Bantu migration did not occur


According to the Kalanga tradition, newly arrived strangers at any given community are first identified and then settled among “their” local people. The identification takes the form of determining the stranger’s totem, and if possible the stranger’s specific group within that totem. As we have now established, a totem is closely associated with the task that the stranger’s workgroup used to perform during the Anunnaki presence on earth.

Wherever the Anunnaki settled (or camped) the people were divided into workgroups. The workgroups in the different settlements were therefore similar, to the extent that the tasks performed in the different localities were similar. While building the pyramids in Egypt, there was need for a group of people who extracted blocks of stone after the blocks were cut. These were “Badusi” or Germans as they are now called. There was no need for such people in Southern African Anunnaki  settlements, therefore if a German arrived in Southern Africa, a not-so-good fit into the community would have to be effected for him/her.  On the other hand if Egyptian Bayela, meaning “pyramid measurers”, or Greeks (as they are now called) arrived, they would be readily fitted among the milk-quantity measurers or grain quantity measurers.

The white colour of the Egyptians was of no consequence, just as the black colour of Southern Africans who went to Egypt was also of no consequence.  Indeed the blacks who emigrated to Egypt were identified by the fact that they had not sh!tted “Abesinya”, rather than by their colour. Since the language (Ikalanga) was common to mankind at the time, and there were no natural barriers like seas between North Africa and Southern Africa, people travelled between these places. The supposed mass Bantu migration from Central or North Africa to Southern Africa did not occur.

What did occur through the ages was migration of small groups of people, such as the Bakhurutshe who travelled to Egypt (Ka Mabunde) within recorded oral history, to accompany their queen who married an Egyptian Pharaoh. The Bakhurutshe travelled to Egypt either when the Anunnaki no longer ate sh!t but milk, or when the Anunnaki had left Earth. That is why the North Africans referred to them (Bakhurutshe) as Abesinya. The majority of the Bakhurutshe who stayed behind in Southern Africa have now had their name Tswana-lised to Bahurutshe. The Bakhurutshe ultimately returned to Southern Africa. To this day the Bakhurutshe do not look like the Bahurutshe or like other Southern Africans. They look more like Ethiopians than Southern Africans.

Indeed the facial appearance of the Bakhurutshe is a good measure, if one is needed, of the time that elapsed between the Anunnaki settlement at Mapungubwe, and the present. The Bakhurutshe changed from Black Southern African to Coffee-coloured North East African (Ethiopian), and are now well on the way to changing back to black Southern African.  These facial changes make nonsense of the claim that Mapungubwe was settled in the 15th century. You do not change from black to Asiatic and back to black in six hundred years. It takes much longer just to change from black to Asiatic.